The Law Office of Jessica Koester, LLC

The Law Office Of
Jessica Koester, LLC

FREE CONSULTATION  
AVAILABLE 24/7  
  618-307-4192
FREE CONSULTATION  AVAILABLE 24/7   618-307-4192

FREE CONSULTATION 24/7  |  618-307-4192

Supreme court says marijuana smell is probable cause for a search

| Mar 30, 2020 | Blog, Drug Charges

Though marijuana is now legal for medical use in Illinois, the smell of it can still get drivers into trouble. On March 19, a unanimous decision by the Illinois Supreme Court found that the smell or sight of cannabis justified probable cause for a police officer to conduct a vehicle search.

The Supreme Court decision stemmed from an incident in May 2017 in which a man’s vehicle was searched by a police officer without a warrant. The search was conducted after the police officer allegedly noticed a “bud” on the backseat as well as the smell of burnt cannabis. During the search, the officer uncovered a rock of crack cocaine and marijuana residue. The accused man was charged for possession of a controlled substance, but he was not charged for cannabis possession. According to reports, the “bud” was not collected or documented.

Initially, the defendant was granted a motion to suppress the evidence found during the search. The 4th District Appellate Court overturned that motion. In a decision affirming the appellate court’s ruling, Supreme Court judges decided that the police officer’s observations were enough probable cause for a vehicle search. The judges pointed out that medical marijuana users are required to keep their marijuana in a sealed container while it is in a vehicle. The judges said the smell of marijuana indicated that the drug was not properly contained.

Warrantless vehicle searches may be found unlawful for many different reasons. If a person was handed drug charges after a warrantless vehicle search, a lawyer may be able to help the person file a motion to suppress evidence that was obtained during the search. A lawyer might argue that the police officer had no probable cause or failed to read the defendant their rights before searching the vehicle.

Archives

Super Lawyers
NACDA Top Ten Ranking 2013
NACDA Top Ten Ranking 2013